Development of Simulation Models to Support Louisiana Sugar Mills

Daira Aragon

Scientists at the LSU AgCenter Audubon Sugar Institute develop sugar factory production models to assist Louisiana’s 11 sugar factories in becoming more efficient. The sugar factories operating in Louisiana are: Alma Plantation, Cajun Sugar Co-op, Cora-Texas, Enterprise Factory (M.A. Patout & Son), Lafourche Sugars, Louisiana Sugar Cane Co-op, Lula Sugar Factory, Raceland Raw Sugar, St. Mary Sugar Co-op, Sterling Sugars and Westfield Sugar Factory.

Figure 1. Simplified raw sugar production process from sugarcane in the software Sugars.

Fig1.jpg thumbnail

A raw sugar factory recovers sugar (sucrose) from the sugarcane plant in a complex process. A simplified version of this process is shown in Figure 1. The process starts by squeezing the raw juice from the cane in a set of roller mills, or a diffuser. Then, suspended solids settle and are removed in a clarifier. Next, the clarified juice is concentrated into syrup in a set of evaporators. Finally, the sugar in the syrup is crystallized by further evaporation in an arrangement of vacuum pans (boiling house), usually in three stages, also called strikes: first or A, second or B, and third or C.

In a simplified description, once the crystals have achieved a desired size in each stage, the mixture of crystals and mother liquor (massecuite) is passed through centrifuges, known in the sugar industry as centrifugals, to separate the crystalline sugar from the molasses. Molasses moves from one stage to the next (molasses from the third stage is called final molasses). Some of the crystalline sugar is mixed with water (magma) and recycled back into the process. Raw sugar from the first and second stages (three-boiling scheme) or from the first stage only (double magma scheme) is shipped to a refinery where refined table sugar is produced. Control criteria for juices, massecuites, magma and sugar throughout the process include solids content (Brix), sucrose content (approximated by the “pol”), ratio of sucrose to solids content (purity) and color.

Simulation is the use of a model to obtain an output response for specified input values. Simulation can provide better understanding of the process and reduce costs and risks associated with experimentation because there is no need to make changes in physical equipment or operating conditions for every case. In the sugar industry, for example, a model of the entire factory can be used to study changes in the amount of pol in raw sugar produced for different crushing rates and cane pol. A model of the boiling house only can be used to study purity of final molasses for different syrup or magma purities. In general, simulation can be used in the design, operation and optimization of the raw sugar factory for:

  • Balancing the factory so that energy usage, water requirement and waste generation are minimized.
  • Obtaining massecuite and magma purities, wash water ratio at centrifugals or amount of backboiling molasses (molasses from one stage returned to the feed on the same stage) that would result in lower final molasses purity, lower color sugar color and higher sugar pol.
  • Determining additional pan capacity and steam requirements when switching to a different boiling scheme or increasing crushing rate.
  • Training of operators.
  • Evaluating expected performance before installation of new clarifiers, bagasse burners and pans, among others.

The Audubon Sugar Institute has led efforts to develop simulation models for all Louisiana sugar factories using the software Sugars. This software is specialized in simulation for the cane and beet sugar industries. Models developed thus far include Enterprise’s diffuser section (diffuser, clarifier and evaporators), boiling house models for Cajun, Westfield, Lula, Alma, Sterling and Raceland, and complete factory models for Westfield, Lafourche and Lula. Information used for model development was taken from factory reports, personal communication with plant personnel, and samples analyzed at Audubon Sugar’s laboratory. Model parameters were adjusted to match factory data as close as possible.

Table 1 (below) presents the percentage that simulation results for boiling house models (developed after 2013) deviated from factory data. Deviations up to 41.2 percent were observed in quantities of massecuite and final molasses because some values presented in factory reports are estimated rather than measured. A maximum purity deviation was 12.5 percent. These models have been used to simulate close to 100 cases to study expected raw sugar production and final molasses purity before major changes in boiling schemes or to evaluate changes in process streams. Results were discussed with factory managers and engineers to assist them in evaluating their systems.

Table 2 shows the differences for the diffuser model of Enterprise factory. Deviations of simulation purities from factory data were less than 6 percent, indicating that the model is a good representation of the diffuser section.

Table 2. Deviation (%) of simulation purities from factory data for diffuser model (11/14/14).

Variable%Deviation
Draft juice2.8
Scalding juice 12.3
Scalding juice 22.1
Cell 32.3
Cell 42.6
Cell 54.8
Cell 67.4
Cell 76.0
Cell 83.9
Cell 92.3
Cell 101.3
Cell 111.2
Cell 121.2
Evaporator0.4

Large and variable processes will generally have simulation results with higher deviations from factory data than simple processes. In the raw sugar factory, there are uncontrolled changes in the impurity content of juice, viscosities and pH, among others. Additionally, there are intentional changes in operating conditions such as an increase or decrease in crushing rate, backboiling molasses, increasing wash water in centrifugals, bypassing mills or stopping equipment for maintenance. Oftentimes, these voluntary changes are not recorded explicitly in the manufacturing report, so it is challenging to represent them in the simulation. Nonetheless, simulation results provide useful information to improve operation.

Daira Aragon is an assistant professor at the Audubon Sugar Institute.

Table 1. Deviation (%) of simulation from factory data for boiling house models.

Process streamCajun
10/19/15
Westfield
10/20/15
Lula
10/22/15
Raceland
11/02/15
Alma
10/30/15
A massecuiteQuantity0.810.04.21.710.9
Purity0.80.30.00.10.7
B massecuiteQuantity15.541.233.83.50.6
Purity2.71.10.30.41.2
C massecuiteQuantity3.220.429.30.123.4
Purity12.53.71.20.44.2
A molassesBrix0.40.40.10.10.5
Purity0.60.30.00.00.5
B molassesBrix1.40.20.30.03.8
Purity9.81.30.10.02.2
Final molassesQuantity10.37.613.61.4--
Brix1.02.01.40.05.9
Purity4.63.30.70.10.1
C magmaBrix0.30.03.1--0.5
Purity1.90.10.20.10.2
B magmaBrix0.0------0.2
Purity
0.8------0.1
Raw sugarQuantity3.05.34.94.80.0
pol0.20.00.00.00.1
Color--1.60.9--12.2
8/23/2017 2:11:09 PM
Rate This Article:

Have a question or comment about the information on this page?

Innovate . Educate . Improve Lives

The LSU AgCenter and the LSU College of Agriculture

Top