
It’s crazy and I don’t know. I find myself saying that a lot as I’ve been talking with producers. The price increase that happened this year is nothing short of astonishing. Further down, you will find an article by our ag economist, Dr. Kurt Guidry, that takes a little deeper look at the market. All the talk of good prices has glossed right over the fact that summer grass has been great. With that, cows and calves have looked really good. It’s been a bit of a wild ride the last 5 years, but it is certainly a good time to be on this roller coaster.
Our Annual Livingston Fall Beef Meeting is scheduled for the afternoon of November 1st. Darlene and Gary McMorris will host us at Mr. Phillip Hoover’s Home Place. I’ll send out more details later but please mark it down on your calendar.
We started a youth component last year that was awesome. The feedback from that was tremendous and we will once again do that on the same day in the morning. We are targeting any junior high and high schoolers that have an interest in beef production so please help spread the word when the flyer goes out.
I based my calculations on a medium fertility requirement of 50-60-60 for nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. I used urea along with diammonium phosphate and muriate of potash as the bulk fertilizer ingredients. This fertilizer rate is the same rate I use on a yearly basis to track costs. As always pull a soil sample and see what your needs will be. The seed cost is based on the more popular tetraploid varieties and planted at a rate of 40 pounds to the acre. The estimated cost to plant is somewhere around $134 this year. The figured costs are going to have some fluctuations. The costs are reflective of a survey of prices from suppliers during the same time frame each year but it is a significant increase from last year. Seed costs have backed down some but that is overshadowed by increases in fertilizer prices. Our fertilizer prices are reflective of the national trends. The cost for same fertilizer rate for this calculation is up about 25% from last year to this year. DAP and Urea are the largest drivers for the increase. The estimated cost is very similar to the cost to plant back in 2021. It is still significantly lower than 2022 prices by close to $35. If you are looking for a bright spot, it has been worse just a short time ago.
Table 1.Cool-season pasture and forage crop varieties suggested for consideration in 2025-2026.
Grasses
| Crop | Varieties |
|---|---|
| Tall Fescue | Jesup Max Q, Kentucky-31 |
| Oats | RAM LA 99016. The varieties Gladiator and Maximus are considered as promising. |
| Cereal Rye | Eiben, Maten, Maton II, Oklon, Wintergrazer 70 |
| Annual Ryegrass | Bashaw Tetraploid, Gulf, Herdsman, Jackson. Lagniappe Tetraploid, Nelson Tetraploid, Prine, Wax Marshall. The varieties MORE Tetraploid and Rio Cana are considered as promising. |
| Wheat | ForageXtreme 30-06 |
| Triticale | FL 08128 |
Legumes
| Crop | Varieties |
|---|---|
| Alfalfa | No commercial varieties have been tested in recent years. |
| Arrowleaf Clover | Amela, Meechi, Yuchi, Apache |
| Balansa Clover | FIXatioN |
| Berseem Clover | Bigbee, Frosty |
| Crimson Clover | Chief, Dixie, Tibbee. AU Robin |
| Red Clover | Kenland, Kenstar, Cherokee, Southern Belle, AU Red Ace, Barduro |
| Subterranean Clover | No commercial varieties have been tested in recent years. |
| White Clover | LA S-1, Osceola, Regalgraze. Pinnacle, Durana, Neches. Renovation, Cresendo, Stamina |
| Ball Clover | Grazer's Select, Don |
Table 2. Mean dry forage production (pounds per acre) from annual ryegrass entries at three locations in Louisiana during three growing seasons, 2022-2024 through 2024-2025.
| Entry | Franklinton | Jeanerette | 3-YearMean |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marshall | 8,966 | 7,151 | 8,058 |
| WMWL2 (expt.)+ | 8,656 | 7,157 | 7,907 |
| ME4 (expt.) | 8,253 | 7,475 | 7,864 |
| ME94 (expt.) | 8,365 | 7,122 | 7,743 |
| Bashaw Tetraploid | 9,007 | 6,262 | 7,634 |
| WMML (expt.) | 8,063 | 6,941 | 7,502 |
| Gulf | 8,263 | 6,373 | 7318 |
| Prine | 8,583 | 6,021 | 7,302 |
| Jackson | 7,721 | 6,815 | 7,268 |
| Herdsman | 7,812 | 6,348 | 7,080 |
| Nelson Tetraploid | 7,844 | 6,080 | 6,962 |
| Lagniappe Tetraploid | 7,747 | 6,140 | 6,944 |
| Earlyploid | 7,957 | 5,705 | 6,831 |
| Tetrastar Tetraploid | 7,241 | 6,245 | 6,743 |
| Mean | s.1n | 6,560 | 7,368 |
| SE++ | 322 | 279 | 198 |
1Entries followed by (expt.) are experimental and not commerdally available. HStandard error
Table 3. Seeding rates for cool-season pasture and forage crops.
Grasses
| Crop | SU<lding Rate (lb/Al Planted Alone | Suuding Ratll (lb/Al Planted in Mixture |
|---|---|---|
| Tall Fescue | 30 | 20 |
| Oats | 100 | 60 |
| Cereal Rye | 90 | 50 |
| Annual Ryegrass | 30 | 20 |
| Wheat | 90 | 60 |
Legumes
| Crop | SU<lding Rate (lb/Al) Planted Alone | Suuding Ratll (lb/Al Planted in Mixture |
|---|---|---|
| Alfalfa | 20-30 | - |
| Arrowleaf Clover | 8 | 5 |
| Balansa Clover | 5-8 | 4 |
| Berseem Clover | 20 | 15 |
| Crimson Clover | 15 | 12 |
| Red Clover | 12 | 8 |
| Subterranean Clover | 15 | 12 |
| White Clover | 5 | 3 |
| Ball Clover | 5 | 3 |
Grasses
| Crop | Prepared Seedbeds Planting Dates | Sod Planting Dates |
|---|---|---|
| Tall Fescue | Sept. 20-Oct. 15 | -- |
| Oats | Sept. 1-Oct. 15 (N LA) Sept. 15-Oct. 15 (S LA) | Approx. Oct. 15 |
| Cereal Rye | Sept. 20-Oct. 15 | Approx. Oct. 15 |
| Annual Ryegrass | Sept. 20-Oct. 15 | Approx. Oct. 15 |
| Wheat | Sept. 20-Oct. 15 | Approx. Oct. 15 |
Legumes
| Crop | Prepared Seedbeds Planting Dates | Sod Planting Dates |
|---|---|---|
| Alfalfa | Oct. 5-Oct. 20 | -- |
| Arrowleaf Clover | Oct. 1-Nov. 15 | Oct. 15-Nov. 15 |
| Balansa Clover | Oct. 1-Nov. 15 | Oct. 15-Nov. 15 |
| Berseem Clover | Oct. 1-Nov. 15 | Oct. 15-Nov. 15 |
| Crimson Clover | Oct. 1-Nov. 15 | Oct. 15-Nov. 15 |
| Red Clover | Oct. 1-Nov. 15 | Oct. 15-Nov. 15 |
| Subterranean Clover | Oct. 1-Nov. 15 | Oct. 15-Nov. 15 |
| White Clover | Oct. 1-Nov. 15 | Oct. 15-Nov. 15 |
| Ball Clover | Oct. 1-Nov. 15 | Oct. 15-Nov. 15 |
Dr. Kurt Guidry, LSU AgCenter
The cattle market continues to experience record breaking prices. And the good news is that these prices are projected to stay with us for at least the next year. Looking at the USDA’s Economic Research Service’s August 2025 projections show that fed cattle, feeder cattle, and cull cow prices are all expected to be higher in the second half of 2025 than they were in the first half (See Figure 1).
Figure 1. Projected US Cattle Prices for 2025 by Quarter (Source: USDA, Economic Research Service)

Not only does USDA project prices increase for the remainder of 2025, they also are projecting prices to average higher in 2026 versus 2025 (See Figure 2). Fed cattle prices are projected to be 7 percent higher in 2026 than 2025 while feeder cattle and cull cow prices are projected to be 10 and 3 percent higher, respectively. And while USDA currently only projects quarterly prices through the first two quarters in 2026, examining the projections for those quarters versus the annual 2026 projections suggests that USDA sees cattle prices remaining at elevated levels throughout 2026.
Figure 2. Projected Annual US Cattle Prices for 2025 and 2026 (Source: USDA, Economic Research Service)

Most of the market analysts agree that the primary driver for this current market is low cattle inventory numbers. So, it follows that until cattle supply numbers begin to climb (and climb significantly), cattle prices will continue to be strong. And while cattle imports from Canada have increased to offset some of the domestic shortages, the Canada cattle industry is also experiencing lower than normal inventory levels. So, this will likely limit the number of cattle coming from that country. And with Mexican cattle prohibited from cattle into the country due to the new world screwworm, for cattle supplies to increase significantly will likely require expansion of cattle numbers here in the United States.
With the view that cattle supplies will require expansion of cattle inventory numbers here in the US, a couple of things must happen for the that to occur. Producers must reduce the number of cows culled from their herds. And producers must retain a portion of their heifers in their herds above the number of cows culled. The number of heifers that are making it into the feedlot and the number of cows and heifers that are slaughtered are good indicators of whether there is potential for herd expansion.
In its Cattle on Feed Reports released in January, April, July, and October, the USDA reports the number of heifers in the feedlot. Figure 3 shows the number of heifers in the feedlot as a percentage of the total cattle on feed. If that percentage is high, that is an indication that more heifers have entered the beef production chain and, therefore, less heifers are being retained in cow herds.
Historically, when comparing the percentage to total cattle and calves inventory numbers shows that as that percentage falls, it is followed by an increase in cattle and calves.
Figure 3. Number of Heifers in Feedlot as a Percentage of Total Cattle on Feed

While the percentages have fallen over the last two years and would be projected to fall again for the remainder of 2025 indicating a poetntal for increased inventory numbers, it should be noted that these percentages still remain at the highest levels experienced over the last 20 years. So while a few more heifers may be being retained, these still high percentages likely means that, at best, the market is seeing a slow down in the reduction of cow herd numbers and not necessarily an increase in those inventory levels. Any increase in inventory numbers would be expected to be very marginal.
Looking at heifer slaughter also shows similar trends. Figure 4 shows the percentage of heifers slaughtered of the previous calf crop estimate. As the number of heifers slaughtered as a percentage of the calf crop increases, this historically would lead to a decrease in cattle and calves inventory numbers.
Figure 4. Heifer Slaugther as a Percentage of Previous Year's Calf Crop

While the percentage is estimated to fall in 2025, it remains at levels that are significantly higher than the last time there was a significant increase in cattle and calves inventory numbers (2014 to 2019).
In fact, the projected percentage for 2025 would be higher than the percentage in any year from 2014 to 2019. So, again, this would likely mean that while heifer retention may be marginally higher in 2025, there would expected to be very limited to any impact on total cattle and calves inventory numbers. As mentioned previously, the heifer retention that may be being experienced would likely only have an impact of slowing the rate of decline in inventory numbers versus actually causing inventory numbers to go up.
While examining heifer slaughter numbers and the numbers of heifer being put into the feedlot does not suggest significant herd expansion, the picture is a little different when examining beef cow numbers. Figure 5 shows the number of beef cows slaughtered as a percentage of total beef cow inventory on January 1st of each year. This percentage can be thought of as an average culling percentage.
Figure 5. Beef Cow Slaughter as a Percentage of Total Beef Cow Inventory

Unlike the number of heifers in the feedlot as a percentage of total cattle on feed and the number of heifers slaughtered as a percentage of the calf crop, this culling percentage has seen significant reductions over the last three years. And while some of the large reductions was due to the abnormally high culling percentage in 2022 due to extensive drought conditions, it seems fairly safe to say that producers have reduced the number of cows being culled in their herds.
But reduced a culling percentage doesn’t, by itself, increase cow herd inventory numbers. It must be accompanied by increased heifer retention. And with no real signs of significant increases in heifer retention, a lower culling percentage likely only means a slowdown in the reduction of cow numbers and a potential stabilization of numbers in 2025. Looking at these numbers certainly wouldn’t suggest a significant increase in cattle inventory numbers happening in 2025.
Given all of the current information available, there is really no indication that cattle inventory numbers have increased significantly in 2025. At worst, the expectation would be that USDA’s Cattle inventory report in January 2026 would show numbers that were roughly the same as 2025. And it wouldn’t be a huge surprise if those numbers were marginally lower than in 2025.
If this current outlook and projection is correct, then that means inventory expansion would not likely happen in any significant way until 2026. Historically, once inventory expansion happens in a significant way, there is still another 12 to 18 months of stronger prices.
Figure 6. Total Cattle and Calves Inventory Versus Annual Average Prices for 500 - 600 pound Feeder Steers
Figure 6 shows total cattle and calves inventory numbers along with the annual average price for 500 to 600 pound feeder steers at the Oklahoma City National Stockyards. After hitting a bottom in 2004, inventory numbers increased in 2005 but prices in 2005 were higher than in 2004. Similarly, after hitting a bottom in 2014, prices were higher in 2015 before falling in 2016.
So, if the market reacts as it has in the past, even if the January 2025 inventory numbers was the end of the liquidation phase, historically prices should be expected to be higher in 2026 than in 2025. And, as has been indicated, if inventory numbers did not increase in 2025 and that January 2026 number shows no increase from the previous year, that would imply these high prices could be here through 2027. Even if the inventory numbers in January 2026 show that there was an increase in 2025, the expectation is that increase will be very small and would still suggest strong prices in 2027.
Maybe not at the levels currently being seen, but even a 10 to 15 percent reduction in 2027 prices from current levels would still be extremely good prices from a historic perspective.
While the current data and information suggests that prices should stay supported for at least the next 12 to 18 months, there are always issues that could materialize that drastically change the overall price outlook picture. For example, no one could foresee the Covid pandemic and the impact it would have on all markets. Market shocks could develop that impact the overall direction of cattle and beef prices. Issues like adverse weather conditions, major trade policy changes, and unexpected downturns in the overall economy could impact the supply and demand balance in both the cattle and beef markets. So, these things need to be continued to be monitored.
The one issue that may not be on the mind of most cattlemen is the impact of high beef prices on overall consumer demand. This has been something that most economists have worried about since beef prices began to move sharply higher in 2020. At what point does high beef prices force consumers to alter their purchase patterns. Fortunately, there has been no apparent negative impact of the high beef prices that the market has seen over the last 4 to 5 years. But that doesn’t mean that beef prices can continue go higher with no consequences. There is likely going to be a point when beef prices reach a level where the market starts to see significant reductions in overall demand.
Because beef prices can’t limitlessly go higher, this means that if cattle prices continue to go higher, there will be some in the marketing channel that will see margins decreased. We have started to see some of this happening. At the beginning of August 2025, prices for fed steers were 26 percent higher than the previous year. However, boxed beef cutout values were only 19 percent higher and the average retail beef price was only 9 percent higher. With the cost of cattle increasing at that level with the price of beef increasing at a lower level, margins for packers and others on the backend of the marketing channel would appear to be shrinking. If cattle prices continue to go up and if the backend of the marketing channel are limited in how much of that additional cost it can past on to consumers, margins would continue to be expected to tighten.
While cattle producers certainly are not going to feel sorry for the packers and the other entities on the backend of the marketing chain, they will need to monitor this situation. How long will packers and others be able or willing to sustain lower margins before it begins to impact their ability and willingness to continue to purchase cattle at these prices?
While there are some things that will need to be monitored, the overriding outlook for cattle prices remains very strong. With the current supply and demand balance in this market, without some sort of significant and unexpected market shock, there seems little that will be able to derail this current strong market.
Bobby Bingham
ANR Agent - Livestock
Livingston Parish
Website: www.lsuagcenter.com/beefcattle
YouTube: LSU AgCenter - Livestock
Facebook: @LSUAgCenterBeefCattle
Instagram: @LSU_agcenter_beef_cattle
Twitter: @BeefLSU