Influence of Irrigation, Row Configuration and Seeding Rate on Grain Sorghum Yield on Alluvial Clay

Linda Benedict, Mascagni, Jr., Henry J., Bell, Robert L.  |  9/1/2009 11:44:59 PM

Table 1.

Henry J. “Rick” Mascagni and Robert L. "Bubba" Bell

Production practices influence grain sorghum yield, and research has found a consistent sorghum yield response to row widths narrower than 40 inches, particularly on alluvial soils – those created by sediment deposited by flowing water. For rows less than 30 inches wide, crops are generally planted on flat seedbeds, which precludes the use of irrigation within the furrow. In recent years, newer planters have the capability of planting twin rows on raised beds. Commercial planters are available that can plant two rows, 8 to 10 inches apart, on top of 40-inch-wide raised beds. Practices such as seeding rate and nitrogen rate may interact with row configuration (twin rows versus the conventional single row). The objective of this research was to evaluate the influence of row configuration, seeding rate and nitrogen rate on yield performance of grain sorghum, with and without irrigation.

Field experiments were conducted in 2005 and 2006 on clay soils at the Northeast Research Station near St. Joseph. Two irrigation treatments were evaluated – a non-irrigated control and a furrow-irrigated treatment. The single rows were planted in mid-May of each year. Twin rows were 9.5 inches apart, centered on raised 40-inch-wide beds. The seeding rates of 78,500 and 104,500 seeds per acre are equivalent to six and eight seeds per foot for single rows and three and four seeds per foot for twin rows. Nitrogen rates of 90, 120 and 150 pounds of nitrogen per acre were injected into the soil. Production practices as recommended by the LSU AgCenter were followed.

Irrigation in 2005 increased grain yield by 361 pounds per acre (Table 1). As a result of relatively low rainfall, particularly in June, four furrow irrigations were required to maintain adequate soil moisture. Yield response to row configuration depended on whether irrigation was used. When not irrigated, yield for twin rows was 12.5 percent higher than the single-row treatments; however, with irrigation, yields for both row configurations were similar – 5,008 pounds per acre for twin rows and 4,944 pounds per acre for single rows. There was little response to seeding rate for either single row configuration. Yield response to nitrogen depended on irrigation more than the row configuration. Yield did not increase above 90 pounds per acre without irrigation but increased up to 120 pounds per acre when irrigated.

In 2006, even though three furrow irrigations were applied, yield did not increase with the application of supplemental water. Unlike 2005, yield response to row configuration did not depend on irrigation. Yields were higher on the twin rows com pared with the single row for both irrigation treatments, averaging a 359-pound-per-acre increase.

Similar to the previous year, there was little yield response to seeding rate. The optimum nitrogen rate was 120 pounds per acre with irrigation and about 90 pounds per acre when sorghum was not irrigated, regardless of row configuration.

Averaged across the two-year trial, using twin rows rather than single rows increased yield 333 pounds (5.9 bushels) per acre – 5,712 pounds per acre compared with 5,379 pounds per acre. Optimum nitrogen and seeding rates were similar for both the twin-row and conventional singlerow production systems. Both trials were planted in mid- May, the back side of the recommended planting window. Relatively low yields, especially in 2005, may have been due in part to the delayed planting.

Additional research is being conducted to further define seedbed management systems for enhancing profitability of grain sorghum.

Henry J. “Rick” Mascagni, Professor, Northeast Research Station, St. Joseph, La., and Robert L. "Bubba" Bell, Research Associate, Sweet Potato Research Station, Chase, La.

(This article was published in the summer 2009 issue of Louisiana Agriculture.)

Rate This Article:

Have a question or comment about the information on this page?

Innovate . Educate . Improve Lives

The LSU AgCenter and the LSU College of Agriculture

Top